NBC Teams Up With News Corp., AOL and Others to Form Video Site To Rival YouTube
NBC Universal and News Corp. announced today that they are joining forces to launch a new video portal this summer enabling them to better control their programming and give YouTube some competition. It's about time. What's taken these major content owners so long?
I like this deal for two major reasons. One, this new video portal will have real syndication in place since they are teaming up with Yahoo, Time Warner Inc.'s AOL, Microsoft Corp.'s MSN, and MySpace as their initial distribution partners. In addition, they are going to focus on producing professional looking content as opposed to most of the junk you see on YouTube. Some have said this new video portal can't be compared to YouTube since YouTube is all about allowing users to upload their own videos and the new NBC Universal and News Corp. portal has not yet defined what roll user generated content will play.
It's hard to know how much of YouTube's traffic comes from user generated video or from TV produced content, but we know that a vast majority of traffic comes from TV content. I mean, how many jackass style videos can you really watch each day?
For me, the outstanding questions about this deal are:
- How will this new NBC Universal and News Corp. portal distribute content? Will they use a firm like Brightcove or try and keep most of the technology in-house? If they don't have a user generated function, then all they are doing is delivering video which they can easily do. But if they need to have transcoding and other functionality, my guess is they will partner with someone so that they enter the market faster.
- What will be the role of user generated video in the new portal?
- How many other content providers will jump on board with NBC Universal and News Corp. to add their content to this new portal? If it is successful when it launches, many other content owners will quickly want to join.
It seems every time there is a big deal announced people always seem to call it a "game changer" even when the new offering has not yet launched. In most cases, I think it's a bunch of hype and they use the term simply to create drama, but in this case, I think this announcement really does have the potential to change the economics for some content owners.


Youtube is for the community
Whatever that can be said, the thing I said from above is entirely true.
Youtube is far better than anything that could be created just for some money making or "competition".
The guys at youtube are enjoying what they've done because they were original, daring and trusting in their Idea and they succeded.
They had FUN doing it, actually.
Business makes me sick to my stomach.
What about Art? Where's art nowadays?
I see art and liberty of expression on youtube.
And I bet whatever this "new site" is about.
They will not make it.
Because It's just plain, insipid money-making.
Haven't those guys got enough cash on their pockets? what about their families??? are the guys behind these "major content companies", happy families?
I bet No.
Thanks ^_^
Posted by: Jose Emmanuel Perez Zurita | Thursday, March 22, 2007 at 08:23 PM
What type of copy protection will this new site be using? I'm sure they want to protect their content better than YouTube does.
Posted by: Kathy Agathos | Friday, March 23, 2007 at 04:13 AM
This is just like the napster days.
The big media companies are losing audiences and estimate the opportunity to gain that back is by creating a similar popular format. The plan does not work.
Youtube success is the simplcity and distribution. It allows people to share and post the video on their websites/blogs/ and other places in effect creating greater distribution.
I doubt a network is going to get executive approval for releasing content to the public to do what they want to. So as the media matures these guys will fall behind the curve.
Joost has not even been publicly seen yet, and is reported to be better - fast downloads, peer-to-peer sharing for file size and higher quality video that is a genuine threat. (Plus they have the Viacom deal).
This deal will more then likely benefit Fox since it has mySpace and programming people want to watch - 24, House, Simpsons, etc. NBC - how many weak internet deals have they been involved with? MSNBC, CNBC and others...
Posted by: steve wagner | Friday, March 23, 2007 at 11:43 AM
I’d be interested in an updated GoogleAnalytics chart (may be two with about six weeks coverage), just to see if the effect did wear off after a while and also, did others link to your new name with the same link-text (allinurl:…). I hope you will publish a follow up.
Posted by: Chat | Friday, August 03, 2007 at 04:41 PM