CDN Pricing Stable In Q1: Drop In Price Only Seen At Highest Levels
At the Streaming Media East show on Tuesday, I published my CDN pricing for Q1 in a session entitled "CDN Pricing: The Going Rate For Video Delivery". You can download the slides from the presentation here.
The first thing that some of you may notice when comparing 2008 Q1 pricing with Q4 of lat year is that it looks like pricing went up. However, for Q1, I changed some of the metrics on how I am reporting pricing as well as who those numbers are from. In the past, I started pricing at 1TB of data transfer per month. As you can see from all the comments on my blog in Q3, pricing is all over the map at low levels and my pricing at 1TB was inaccurate for a lot of customers. Today, anything under 50TB is considered small and CDNs don't think of a customer being large until they are doing about 500TB per month. So moving forward, I am going to give out pricing starting at 50TB a month of transfer. Anything under 50TB a month is now really impossible to give out an "average" number for.
Also, pricing for Q1 is now only from CDN players who are focused on going after large companies. In the past, I included data from those who go after large companies as well as those we go after small and medium sized customers. Those who go after small and medium sized customers are what I call regional service providers. There are probably over a 100 of those companies and they all do pricing differently, including packaged pricing where you get certain levels of storage and transfer all for one price. They tend to price very differently than those CDN going after large business.
The only place I saw pricing go down in Q1 is with a very small percentage of the largest customers who continue to push a lot more traffic each month. Those doing over a petabyte. The lowest price I heard for 2PB a month was two and a half cents per GB delivered.
That being said, here are the numbers for Q1. I will post the video archive of my session as soon as it is available.



Dan, how is that pricing skewed across Windows Media vs Flash and http vs streaming?
Posted by: TJ | Thursday, May 22, 2008 at 01:04 PM
Good questions, I address them in the video but since it is not up yet.
This pricing is for video delivery, streaming or progressive download. None of the major CDNs charge any different for the protocol. As for Flash streaming, and I stress, streaming, from a Flash Media Server, that is still a little bit more expensive, but some CDNs are eating that cost. Others are charging between one and two cents per GB delivered.
Posted by: Dan Rayburn | Thursday, May 22, 2008 at 01:15 PM
Since 99.99% of customers use less than 50TB pcm, any stats on lower data rate charges ?
Personally, I've seen a flat rate of $1 under 10TB being commonplace.
Posted by: Iolo Jones | Sunday, May 25, 2008 at 07:09 PM
Hi Iolo, not sure where you get the 99.99% number from. Lots of customers do well over 50TB a month. When you doing less than 1TB a month or even 10-15TB a month, the pricing is all over the map. I have seen it at $8 per GB, and less than $1 per GB. So many companies can offer hosting services for such a small customer that there is no consistency in the pricing.
Posted by: Dan Rayburn | Monday, May 26, 2008 at 10:41 PM
Dan, do you have any statistics gathered for number of customers at each layer?
Posted by: Dan Benson | Thursday, June 05, 2008 at 06:16 PM
One more question, do you see trends amongst the CDNs as to where they stand on the ranges you list?
Posted by: Dan Benson | Thursday, June 05, 2008 at 06:52 PM
Some CDNs say how many customers they have in their press releases and on their websites, others don't.
Yes, I know which CDNs charge what based on the ranges I gave but I don't break that out. Not fair to compare one vendor to another on price unless you are looking at a SPECIFIC contract.
Posted by: Dan Rayburn | Friday, June 06, 2008 at 12:19 AM
Dan,what about a pricing for the P2P delivery?
Posted by: Eyal | Monday, June 30, 2008 at 06:39 AM